Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact: Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you

Mary Emery, Lorie Higgins, Scott Chazdon, Debra Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

A mind mapping approach to evaluation called Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) has been developed and used by a number of Extension faculty across the country recently. This article describes three approaches to REM, as well as key differences and similarities. The authors, each from different landgrant institutions, believe REM is an effective way to document direct and indirect impacts of community development programs while providing an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to program participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2TOT1
JournalJournal of Extension
Volume53
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© by Extension Journal, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using ripple effect mapping to evaluate program impact: Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this