TY - JOUR
T1 - Who Represents Me? Race, Gender, Partisan Congruence, and Representational Alternatives in a Polarized America
AU - English, Ashley
AU - Pearson, Kathryn
AU - Strolovitch, Dara Z.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 University of Utah.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - The belief among citizens that their views are represented is essential to the legitimacy of American democracy, but few studies have explicitly examined which political actors Americans feel best represent them. Using data from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we ask new questions about whether respondents who share a partisan, racial, or gender identification with their members of Congress (MCs) feel those members best represent them. Although the framers designed the House so that individuals’ own MCs would be their closest and most responsive representatives, a majority of respondents turn to other actors for representation. Partisanship is a key reason for this attenuated connection, as respondents who do not share a partisan identification with their MCs are more likely than those who do to rely on their party’s congressional leaders or advocacy organizations for representation instead. Sharing a racial identification with one’s own MC can strengthen representational connections as respondents who share a racial identity with their MCs are significantly more likely than respondents who do not to indicate that their MC represents them “the most.” These results shed light on enduring questions about the significance of symbolic representation and its link to partisanship and descriptive representation.
AB - The belief among citizens that their views are represented is essential to the legitimacy of American democracy, but few studies have explicitly examined which political actors Americans feel best represent them. Using data from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we ask new questions about whether respondents who share a partisan, racial, or gender identification with their members of Congress (MCs) feel those members best represent them. Although the framers designed the House so that individuals’ own MCs would be their closest and most responsive representatives, a majority of respondents turn to other actors for representation. Partisanship is a key reason for this attenuated connection, as respondents who do not share a partisan identification with their MCs are more likely than those who do to rely on their party’s congressional leaders or advocacy organizations for representation instead. Sharing a racial identification with one’s own MC can strengthen representational connections as respondents who share a racial identity with their MCs are significantly more likely than respondents who do not to indicate that their MC represents them “the most.” These results shed light on enduring questions about the significance of symbolic representation and its link to partisanship and descriptive representation.
KW - descriptive representation
KW - gender
KW - partisanship
KW - race
KW - symbolic representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060175399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060175399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1065912918806048
DO - 10.1177/1065912918806048
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060175399
SN - 1065-9129
VL - 72
SP - 785
EP - 804
JO - Political Research Quarterly
JF - Political Research Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -