Efficacy of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial

Kristen L. McMaster, Panayiota Kendeou, Jasmine Kim, Reese Butterfuss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention (TeLCI) designed to teach inferencing in a non-reading context. A group of Grades 1 and 2 students from 2 elementary schools in the U.S. Midwest identified as at risk of comprehension difficulties were assigned randomly to a business-as-usual control group or to use TeLCI over an 8-week period. TeLCI comprised three learning modules per week that involved (a) learning new vocabulary, (b) watching fiction or nonfiction videos, and (c) answering inferential questions. Students also engaged in small-group read-alouds with their teachers once per week. Students who experienced TeLCI improved their inferencing and benefited from scaffolding and feedback provided during the intervention. Students’ pre- to posttest inferencing gains were comparable with those of control students. Female students and those receiving special education services appeared less likely to benefit from TeLCI, whereas multilingual students were more likely to respond. Further work is needed to determine the optimal conditions under which TeLCI will benefit young children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-152
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Learning Disabilities
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2023.

Keywords

  • educational technology
  • inference
  • reading comprehension
  • response to intervention

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this