Review of curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An update and extension of the literature

Gena Nelson, Allyson J. Kiss, Robin S. Codding, Nicole M. McKevett, Johna F. Schmitt, Soyoung Park, Monica E. Romero, Jiyung Hwang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this literature review on curriculum-based measurement in mathematics (CBM-M) was to update and extend the Foegen et al. (2007) progress monitoring in mathematics review. We included 99 studies focused on at least one of the three stages of CBM research (i.e., one point in time [screening], repeatedly over time [progress monitoring], and instructional utility) in mathematics for students in preschool through Grade 12. The results of this review indicated that researchers have increased the amount of research conducted at the early mathematics and secondary levels; however, many studies focused on the stages of CBM research are still conducted at the elementary level. The results also demonstrated that most studies (k = 85; 85.9%) were focused on Stage 1, with fewer studies reporting results related to Stage 2 (k = 40; 40.4%) and Stage 3 (k = 5; 5.1%). The results of this literature review also underscore that although considerable growth has been achieved in the past 15 years in CBM-M development and reporting, next steps in research include a focus on investigating the uses of CBM-M for progress monitoring and instructional decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-42
Number of pages42
JournalJournal of school psychology
Volume97
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Society for the Study of School Psychology

Keywords

  • Curriculum-based measurement
  • Literature review
  • Mathematics

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Review
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An update and extension of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this